Monthly Archive for January, 2007

Bruce Schneier: Security theater can be a good thing

Security guru Bruce Schneier has written an interesting piece on the use of RFID bracelets in US hospitals to counter baby abduction. What makes it interesting is that Bruce actually admits that security theater can be a good thing:

There are times when people feel less secure than they actually are. In those cases — like with mothers and the threat of baby abduction — a palliative countermeasure that primarily increases the feeling of security is just what the doctor ordered. [...] Most of the time security theater is a bad trade-off, because the costs far outweigh the benefits. But there are instances when a little bit of security theater makes sense.

So no monkeys or snowglobes in carry on luggage, “Are you a terrorist?” -questionnaires, licensing boaters, ID cards to stop bullying, car rentals requiring fingerprints and bulletproof textbooks is bad security theater, but armed troops with no bullets is good security theater:

Much of the post-9/11 security can be explained by this as well. I’ve often talked about the National Guard troops in airports right after the terrorist attacks, and the fact that they had no bullets in their guns. As a security countermeasure, it made little sense for them to be there. They didn’t have the training necessary to improve security at the checkpoints, or even to be another useful pair of eyes. But to reassure a jittery public that it’s OK to fly, it was probably the right thing to do.

Bruce Schneier’s blog is a must read for anyone interested in security matters.

Violent video games crackdown

game_violence250.jpgIt seems to me that Germany has gone berserk following their damned EU presidency. First they want to ban the sacred Hindu symbol in all of EU and now they are pushing for a ban on violent video games. “A certain degree of linkage between the growing violence among the younger generation and the growing diffusion of violent games exists,” said Franco Frattini, the European Justice commissioner, adding that “Protection of children cannot have borders.”

I totally disagree with Mr. Frattini, I think that the protection of children can have and should have borders. Censoring the Internet for example would be going too far, as would banning violent computer games. Why not ban violent books while you’re at it? Well that was a rhetorical question, but perhaps it will be useful to answer it. Dear Mr. Frattini, well-balanced, nonviolent and totally normal people read violent books, watch excessively violent action movies or play incredibly violent video games from time to time. Just for fun. Just for the hell of it – because they can, because they live in a free society. It’s fun to shoot an enemy in the head, blow up a building with C4 or to torture a hostage. Video games are good fun. Some of them just happen to be a wee bit violent.

The real question is, is there any scientific evidence which shows that violent games cause violent behaviour? And even if violent games did trigger violent behaviour in let’s say, 0.001% of the population, would that justify banning violent games from the rest 99.999% of the population?

It’s important to protect the children, yada yada yada.” Whenever you hear the words “protect the children“, you should switch on your bullshit detector. You can’t ban drugs, violence, scary religions, telemarketing assholes, bad Italian food, liquids in carry-on luggage, homosexuals, homophobics, female drivers or rainy weather. These things are here to stay. There will always be plenty of scapegoats and plenty of fools willing to look no further.

Great tabloid journalism – (pause) not!

Yesterday Finland’s sensational scandalmongering tabloid Ilta-Sanomat featured a typical overblown headline “Contestant attacks Idol judge” (Finnish). In the article they write that bodyguards had to drag out the furious contestant, Eric Chapman, who had pulled out a small object from his pocket and tried to attack Simon.

Judge for yourself. Having been rejected, Eric clearly says to Simon “Here, I have to do something, I have to fix your hair…” and then pulls out a tub of hair gel. The bodyguards then escort him out of the room, but barely touch him.

Why do professional journalists write such crap and get away with it? I’m sick and tired of these bullshit yellow press headlines. Somebody please shoot them. (Bad bad bad! Let’s not make jokes about shooting journalists.)

Why?

Joutsen

Why are they still here? Miksi ne vielä ovat täällä?

This is my first contribution to valokuvatorstai.

Will The Pirate Bay soon govern their own micronation?

sealandThe Pirate Bay wants to buy Sealand. They are dreaming of “a great place for everybody, with high-speed Internets access, no copyright laws and vip accounts to The Pirate Bay.” My question is, since when do pirates need to buy a country? Why don’t they just gather a crew of fierce pirates, steal commandeer (nautical term) a battleship and raid Sealand.

Let’s party like it’s 1984!

28 CamerasI was amused yesterday when I saw a woman filming at my local K-Citymarket with a small digital camera. She was just filming all the shelfs as she went along until she was stopped by store personnel. “Oh, I’m sorry, it’s for my blog. I’m from Canada!” she explained. I didn’t bother to express my strong views at that time, but now I regret that I didn’t. I find it ironic that shop owners want to prevent customers from filming their stores and products, while they themselves monitor all customers with hundreds of surveillance cameras hanging all over the ceiling. They are recording your every move, but don’t want you to take a single picture of them. Next time you enter a store just look up. All those little black globes are cameras that can rotate full 360 degrees and zoom incredibly close. Try this: walk around a department store and count all the security cameras. Now look behind you. Yep, the security guards are following you. If you didn’t lift anything you don’t need to worry about a single thing. These guys are just doing their job, busting shoplifters.

What most security personnel don’t know is that in Finland you are allowed to take pictures at all public places, such as subway stations, shopping malls and – even local supermarkets. The only thing you are not allowed to do is invade one’s privacy. Taking pictures at a supermarket doesn’t invade anyone’s privacy, it doesn’t do any damage to the store or the products and it does not threaten national security. Despite this security guards in Finland are constantly telling photographers not to take pictures at public places. Take pictures of your local supermarket all you want, you have every right to do so. If you get dragged out of the store and beaten by security guards – make sure you catch all of it, post your video on YouTube and enjoy your fifteen minutes of fame.

The funny thing is, I’m one of these people. I am Big Brother. I’m guilty of sitting behind the monitors and spying on thousands of innocent people, trying to spot shoplifters at a giant department store. It’s thrilling, you can feel the adrenaline rushing through your vains when you see a shoplifter pocketing a bottle of expensive perfume. You watch his every move. When he moves to the end of the aisle you know exactly which camera will best show him from there on. You follow him with two cameras simultaneously, making sure you never lose him out of your sight, because if you do, he could drop his stash undetected. At the same time you give instructions to the guys who are on the floor. You tell them where the subject is moving and what he’s doing, so that they don’t have to get too close to him. When the subject exits the building you do a “surprise catch”. Imagine the shoplifter exiting the building. Most of them look behind to see if they are being followed. Then they look in both directions of the street. The shoplifter doesn’t see anyone and feels reliefed, imagining he is going to get away with it. He slowly starts to pick up pace as he heads away from the store. Meanwhile the guys are waiting. When you inform them which way the subject is heading, they’ll walk up to the shoplifter from behind the corner, as cool and calm as possible. This is done just for your own amusement, to feel superior, and partly just to piss off the shoplifter. You then take him in and call the cops. Most shoplifters will tell you straight away that they didn’t steal anything. They’ll repeat it over and over again. But it doesn’t matter one bit what they say, as long as you have the evidence. Most are angry at themselves for failing and will just sware a lot and curse their bad luck, whereas teenage kids who are caught the first time usually shit in their pants and start to tremble.

Do I feel guilty about prying on people? Not one bit, because I was just doing my job. A lot of shoplifters are caught because of good surveillance systems, so their use is justified and they are valuable to the shop owner. As long as nobody is pointing his camera at my window, I just don’t care how many all seeing eyes there are in the sky. Having said that, I still feel that a shop owner who monitors his customers but doesn’t allow them to monitor him, is a hypocrite. However you feel about Big Brother, you have to admit that surveillance systems are cool and fun to set up. In my next post, I’ll look at how to set up a surveillance system with Linux for monitoring pets. For that experiment I’ll be using my guinea pig Pörri as er… a guinea pig ;) Wow, I finally get a chance to blog about guinea pigs. And you though “Linux, caffeine and guinea pigs” was just a tagline… Here’s a little sneak preview:
Pörri cam

4 8 15 16 23 42

Dharma The Lost Numbers. These numbers are the core numerical values of the Valenzetti equation, which “predicts the exact number of years and months until humanity extinguishes itself” (as reveled by Rachel Blake in the Sri Lanka video). Mathematicians and savant autistic patients are working on the equation day and night at a basement of the Vik Institute in Iceland. Some of them against their own will. Somehow the Valenzetti equation is made up of five Egyptian hieroglyphs, the same hieroglyphs that can be seen on the countdown timer in the Swan station. Purpose of the Dharma Initiative? To change any one of the core factors of the Valenzetti Equation in order to save the human race from extinction.

These little clues and hints of the backgrounds of the Hanso Foundation and the Dharma initiative have been revealed by the Lost Exprience, an alternate reality game from the writers of Lost. By piecing together little pieces of video clips found from official Lost websites, Lost fans have been able to gather more information about some of the mysteries behind Lost. Wow, now that’s one hell of a TV show!

Yeah, I’m hooked on Lost. For me it’s not enough to just watch an episode. I study each episode meticulously, looking for easter eggs, references to literature, the numbers and other clues. Maybe I’m a little crazy, or perhaps a bit too obsessed with Lost, but I definately think it’s the best TV series ever, well worth all the attention it has received. To prove that I’m indeed crazy – my New Year’s resolution for 2007: to read all the books shown on Lost. The list of books shown or mentioned in Lost is pretty long, so I’ll limit the number of books to just the books that are actually shown on the series or quoted explicitly.

I’m currently reading the Third Policeman by Flann O’Brien, which was chosen “very specifically for a reason”, according to Lost script writer Craig Wright, and apparently contains “key insights into the show”. I’ve already read The Bible, Stephen King’s Carrie and Rainbow Six by Tom Clancy. The books I still have to read:

  • After All these Years, by Susan Isaacs
  • Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret, by Judy Blume
  • Bad Twin, by Gary Troup
  • The Brothers Karamazov, by Fyodor Dostoevsky
  • Dirty Work, by Stuart Woods
  • The Epic of Gilgamesh
  • Hindsight, by Peter Wright
  • Lancelot, by Walker Percy
  • Lord of the Flies, by William Golding
  • An Occurrence At Owl Creek Bridge, by Ambrose Bierce
  • Of Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck
  • Our Mutual Friend, by Charles Dickens
  • The Turn of the Screw, by Henry James
  • Watership Down, by Richard Adams
  • A Wrinkle in Time, by Madeleine L’Engle

I’ll add any books shown later on in the series to the list. Provided that Sawyer doesn’t read too many books in season 3, I’ll read all of these before 2008. Until then, thank you and namaste!